Reed v. . Lavender Bros.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
The award was properly entered upon the facts found by the hearing commissioner, later adopted and approved by the full Commission, as they are amply supported by the evidence.
It is well settled that the award of the Industrial Commission is “conclusive and binding as to all questions of fact,” if supported by sufficient competent evidence. N. C. Code, sec. 8081 (ppp); Clark v. Woolen Mills, 204 N. C., 529, 168 S. E., 816; Massey v. Board of Education, 204 N. C., 193, 167 S. E., 695; Kenan v. Motor Co., 203 N. C., 108, 164 S. E., 729. Indeed, neither this Court nor the Superior Court, on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Massey v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Kenan v. Duplin Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Ussery v. Erlanger Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Clark v. . Woolen MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thomason v. Red Bird Cab Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Byers v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Brice v. Robertson House Moving, Wrecking & Salvage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Evans v. Tabor City Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Thomas v. Raleigh Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.