Legal Opinion

United States v. $9,041,598.68 (Nine Million Forty One Thousand, Five Hundred Ninety Eight Dollars & Sixty Eight Cents)

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided April 25, 1997No. Civil Action H-95-3182PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ATLAS, District Judge.

This civil forfeiture case was tried to a jury during the week of March 10, 1997. The jury returned a verdict on March 15, 1997. The parries now have filed motions for judgment. See Government’s Motion for Judgment [Doc. #202]; Claimant’s Motion for Judgment [Doc. # 204]; Claimant’s Motion for Entry of Judgment as Matter of Law [Doc. # 205],

For the reasons stated herein, the Government’s Motion for Judgment is granted, and Claimant’s motions are denied. The Defendant currency will be forfeited to the Government in its entirety.

This opinion also…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Charles D. Gautreaux v. Scurlock Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Three Hundred Sixty Four Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty Dollars ($364,960.00) in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Charles N. Schwarz, Jr. v. Harry Folloder, Alexander Grant & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. RUIZ-MASSIEUBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
  2. United States v. $8,221,877.16 in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  3. Amaya v. Infinite Homes Group 646/500 LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
  4. Diaz Mancilla v. Chesapeake Outdoor Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API