Legal Opinion

Harmer v. Rendleman

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1933No. 3414PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, who was plaintiff in the court below, instituted this action against the receiver of the American National Bank of Asheville, N. C., to recover certain bonds and notes deposited with that bank, or, in lieu thereof, damages on account of their loss or conversion. By consent of parties the trial judge submitted the following issue to the jury: “Were the securities described in the complaint stolen or lost through the gross negligence of the American National Bank?” And the jury, at the direction of the court, answered this issue “Yes.” Judgment was then entered…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Peters v. BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Empire State Surety Co. v. Carroll CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  4. Frelinghuysen v. NugentU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1888
  5. Beck v. Wilkins-Ricks Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Whitin MacH. WorksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  2. Swan v. Children's Home Soc. of West VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  3. Lifsey v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  4. Poole v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  5. Edisto Nat. Bank of Orangeburg v. BryantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API