City of New York v. Dezer Properties, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Andreas, J. (dissenting in part).
While I agree with the majority that the so-called “60-40 rule” was properly applied by the IAS Court in determining whether a “substantial portion” of defendants’ establishment includes an adult eating or drink*122ing establishment, I disagree that defendants have failed to prove compliance with such rule.
The City appeals from an order, entered March 18, 1999, in this nuisance abatement proceeding brought pursuant to title 7, chapter 7, subchapter 2 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, in which the IAS Court (Stephen G. Crane, J.) granted…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stringfellow's of New York, Ltd. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hickerson v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- In re ShahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Hickerson v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Stringfellow's of New York, Ltd. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.