Legal Opinion

United States v. Boak Fish Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota

Decided May 12, 1906No. 115 (1,735)Published

On Application for Review of a Decision of the Board of United States General Appraisers.

1Opinion of the Court

AMIDON, District Judge.

This is an appeal by the United States from the decision of the Board of General Appraisers (G. A. 6,080, T. D. 26,512), touching an importation of foxberries at the port of St.Paul, Minn., by the Boak Fish Company. The berries are imported in barrels. After the barrels are filled with the berries, water is added, so as to make a cushion between the berries, and prevent them from crushing by their own weight in the process of shipment. The function of the water is not to chemically change the berry or to act as a preservative. It serves no purpose but to protect the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. American Net & Twine Co. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Boak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API