Bell v. State

W. SHARP, Judge.

Bell appeals from sentences imposed following his conviction for armed robbery and his violations of probation for strong armed robbery and grand theft. Bell was sentenced *1141as an habitual offender to twenty years imprisonment for all three offenses, to be served concurrently. On appeal, Bell argues that the trial court erred in imposing habitual offender sentences for his violations of probation under Snead v. State, 616 So.2d 964 (Fla.1993). The state concedes error.

We affirm Bell’s convictions. We affirm the sentence for armed robbery, but vacate the sentences for robbery and…