Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Heim

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 28, 1998No. 96-16551Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

134 F.3d 378

2 Cal. Bankr. Ct. Rep. 36

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Philip D. ROBERTS; Lynn Roberts; Robert T. McArthur;

Denny Delk; Karen Delk; Jack T. Bell; Arthur B.

Gauss, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Werner HEIM, Defendant and TEXOIL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-16551.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Jan. 12, 1998.

D…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wanderer v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Cooper v. PickettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API