First National Bank v. Getz
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Marshall District Court. — Hon. D. B>. Hindman, Judge. Action on a promissory note. Judgment against defendant Getz and in favor of plaintiff; also judgr ment in favor of Geéz and against the defendant society. Both Getz and the Equitable Life Assurance Society appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.
I. This action is on a promissory note for two1 hundred and five dollars, signed by the defendant Getz, dated December 7, 1892, and due six months after date. The petition alleges that Durstine, the payee of the note, guarantied the payment of the same, and sold it before its majority to plaintiff, and that it is its property, and unpaid. This petition the defendant Getz answered, admitting the execution of the note, and denying all other averments of the petition. For an affirmative defense Getz averred that on April 5, 1892, he had executed a note for a like amount to Ms coi-appellant for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lane v. KrekleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Rock Island National Bank v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Woodward v. RodgersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Potter v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
3Cited by1 opinion
- Freittenberg v. RubelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904