Hudson v. Hunt
Superior Court of New Hampshire
Fisk, the trustee in this ease, disclosed, in his answers to the interrogatories, that lie and Joab Hunt had the use of a brick yard, belonging to C. Hunt, the principal, during the summer of the year 1829, for which they agreed to pay to the said Caleb Hunt the sum of §70, in bricks ; which sum still remains due and unpaid ; that the trustee, at the close of the summer of the year 1829, purchased all the right of the said Joab Hunt in the bricks, which they had made in the…
Read the full summary
Fisk, the trustee in this ease, disclosed, in his answers to the interrogatories, that lie and Joab Hunt had the use of a brick yard, belonging to C. Hunt, the principal, during the summer of the year 1829, for which they agreed to pay to the said Caleb Hunt the sum of §70, in bricks ; which sum still remains due and unpaid ; that the trustee, at the close of the summer of the year 1829, purchased all the right of the said Joab Hunt in the bricks, which they had made in the said yard, and agreed with the said Joab, to pay the said sum of $70, to the said Caleb Hunt ; that soon after the…
1Opinion of the Court
l'lj t’:° f> ,hÍ
P ie K‘‘d°d i]>r.< Le who holds goods as a pledge, cnnnoi. be heb1 ~s *kc truth ce cf i ion veho pledged the goo'V Too ¡.¡lotee c-noet, thereine. be charged in this case, on account cf ihe goods he holds in his hands.
It is also settled, as a general rule, that one of Ino joint debtors cannot be charged as a irrs.ec, unless the other debtor is joined with him ir the proco.'S. And v. e see no reason, why the general role should not gave n the decision of this case. Foi, t.ePvhVi-aiuing the agreement betwen the trustee and .Soar Hunt, that d.-' trustee should pay the rent to…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Demerit v. LyfordSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1853
- Ladd v. BakerSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1852
- Barker v. GarlandSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1850
- Briggs v. WalkerSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1850