Legal Opinion

L.A. Gear, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Thom McAn Shoe Company and Melville Corporation and Pagoda Trading Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 13, 1993No. 89-1488, 89-1497, 91-1104 and 91-1105PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

988 F.2d 1117

61 USLW 2532, 25 U.S.P.Q.2d 1913

L.A. GEAR, INC., Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant,

v.

THOM McAN SHOE COMPANY and Melville Corporation and Pagoda

Trading Company, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 89-1488, 89-1497, 91-1104 and 91-1105.

United States Court of Appeals,

Federal Circuit.

Feb. 16, 1993.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion

for Rehearing In Banc

Declined April 13, 1993.

Robert A. Horowitz, Law Office of Kelley, Drye & Warren, Stamford, CT, argued, for plaintiff, cross-appellant, L.A. Gear, Inc. With him on the brief was Mark S. Gregory.

Doreen L. Costa, Law Office of Brumbaugh, Graves, Donohue &…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. L. A. Gear, Inc. v. Thom McAn Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API