Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Hanno

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 5, 1889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Writ of Entry, for land in Lisbon, and a Bill in Equity, brought by the defendants against the plaintiff for a reformation of a mortgage. Facts found by the court. The Little farm is one tract of land in the towns of Lyman and Lisbon. The buildings and most of the farm are in Lyman. The part in Lisbon is claimed by both parties. O. and G. A. Carr, owning the farm, conveyed it to Clough by a mortgage of which the defendants ask a reformation.

Read the full summary

Writ of Entry, for land in Lisbon, and a Bill in Equity, brought by the defendants against the plaintiff for a reformation of a mortgage. Facts found by the court. The Little farm is one tract of land in the towns of Lyman and Lisbon. The buildings and most of the farm are in Lyman. The part in Lisbon is claimed by both parties. O. and G. A. Carr, owning the farm, conveyed it to Clough by a mortgage of which the defendants ask a reformation. The mortgage, described the farm asa “tract of land situated in said Lyman, together with the buildings thereon, meaning to convey the same as was deeded…

1Opinion of the CourtDoe, C. J.

The error in the clause of the mortgage that described the land as “ situated in said Lyman ” was corrected by the accompanying reference to the record of a deed of land situated in Lyman and Lisbon. Colby v. Collins, 41 N. H. 301, 303. The meaning of the mortgage was expressly declared to be, that it conveyed the land that was conveyed to the mortgagors by the recorded deed to which reference was made for a more particular description. The mistake, being corrected in the paper in which it occurred, is immaterial.

Elliot v. Heath, 6 N. H. 426, was a writ of entry in which the demanded promises…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCormick v. SullivantSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Des Moines Navigation & Railroad v. Iowa Homestead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. In Re CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Wilkerson v. SchoonmakerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Capron v. AnnessMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hodgdon v. LibbySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1896
  2. Bacon v. ThompsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
  3. Lane v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022
  4. Robertson v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022
  5. Stowe v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API