Legal Opinion

Potomac Insurance v. MacNaughton

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

The amended complaint in this action alleges the following facts: Plaintiff insurance company insured plaintiff Connor from damage to his automobile resulting from collision, the contract being a $50 deductible policy. After plaintiff Connor’s automobile had collided with one driven by this defendant, plaintiff insurance company paid its insured $169.17, taking at that time from Mr. Connor a release and subrogation of his rights against this defendant. It is also alleged that prior to the commencement of the action the defendant paid to Mr. Connor $50 upon his property damage claim, receiving…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Hooker Electrochemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Pearl Assurance Company, Ltd. v. EpsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Pacific Fire Insurance v. L. A. D. Motors Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. VaccariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Farmers Ins. Exchange v. ArltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. VaccariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Bahn Ex Rel. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ShalevDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Clarcq v. Chamberlain Mobile Home Transport, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API