Buchanan's Sons v. Cranford Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, The Cranford Company,’ from a judgmént of the Municipal Court of the city of Mew York in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of said court on the 7th day of April, Í905.
1Opinion of the Court
Hirschberg, P. J.:
The plaintiff has recovered a judgment for damages which are changeable to the negligence of the defendant'.- While a horse and Wagon Of the plaintiff was being driven in one of the public streets in the borough of Brooklyn on the morning of May 12, 1904, the horse became, frightened by a steam roller then operated by the defendant in violation of the requirements of section, 155 of the Highway Law (Laws of 1890, chap. 568, as amd. by Laws of 1901, chap.-531). There-was evidence tending to show that there was no one in front of the-roller to warn persons of its approach as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Allen v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Moore v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Mullen v. Village of Glens FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Halstead v. Village of WarsawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Rector v. Syracuse Rapid Transit RailwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Parilli v. Brooklyn City RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Municipal Paving Co. v. Donovan Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Cook v. Packard Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Dettmar v. Burns Bros.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.