Legal Opinion

Conklin v. . United Construction and Supply Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 25, 1915, affirming a' judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action for the cancellation of certain capital stock of the defendant United Construction and Supply Company, issued to Samuel M. Jarvis, originally a defendant; for an accounting between the plaintiff and the…

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 25, 1915, affirming a' judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action for the cancellation of certain capital stock of the defendant United Construction and Supply Company, issued to Samuel M. Jarvis, originally a defendant; for an accounting between the plaintiff and the defendant corporation and to compel said Jarvis to account to it for dividends received by him; to impress a trust on certain…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chase, Collin, Cuddebaok, Hogan and Cardozo, JJ. Not voting: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Greenbaum v. American Metal, Climax, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  2. Katzowitz v. SidlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Seaman v. Ironwood Amusement Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API