Legal Opinion

McGraw v. Seigel

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 19, 1935No. 42969PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

In this law action plaintiff sought to recover damages from defendant for injuries sustained by him in an automobile collision while riding in the one of the colliding automobiles that was being driven by defendant; alleged negligence of defendant being the basis of plaintiff’s cause of action.

As a defense defendant alleged in Division One of her answer substantially the following: that at the time of the accident plaintiff was an employee of one Dave Seigel, and received his injuries in the course of such employment; that such proceedings were had under the Workmen’s Compensation Act…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hoyne v. DanischIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Oliphant v. HawkinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. Hilsinger v. Zimmerman Steel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Southern Surety Co. v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Stephens v. D. & St. P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lebak v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Disbrow v. Deering Implement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. Sinclair Refining Co. v. BurchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  4. State Ex Rel. McElhinney v. All-Iowa Agricultural Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  5. De Sauvage v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API