Legal Opinion

Marquez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 21, 1899No. 1738PublishedCited by 7 opinions

No statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the theft of cattle and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the peniten-. tiary.

' An inspection of the record discloses two motions, both of which are styled, “First Amended Motion for New Trial,” filed on the 24th- and 25th of February, respectively. The motion filed February 24th has the affidavit of appellant attached, claiming a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, but the affidavit of the party by whom he proposed to prove the newly discovered facts is not attached to said motion. The motion filed on the 25th of…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Ex Parte HernanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  3. Ex Parte WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Ex Parte WalshCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Andres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API