Legal Opinion
State v. Boudreaux
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 2, 1922No. 24978PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from Twentieth Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne; I-I. M. Wallis, Jr., Judge. Benny Boudreaux was indicted for keeping a blind tiger, and he moved to quash the indictment.
1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.
The defendant was indicted for keeping a “blind tiger” in the parish of Ter-rebonne on the 23d day of July, 1921, contrary to form of the statute of the state of Louisiana, Act 8 of the Acts of the General Assembly of the Extra Session of the year 1915.
Defendant requested a bill of particulars, and in the bill of particulars furnished the district attorney says:
“That the keeping of a blind tiger, as charged in the indictment herein, consisted of the keeping of a place by the accused where intoxicating liquors were kept for sale, on the date set forth in the indictment; said place being…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- City of Shreveport v. MarxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
3Cited by3 opinions
- Graham Glass Co. v. Nu Grape Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- State v. VeneziaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935