Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Rukamp

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1932No. Docket No., 124, Calendar No. 36,583PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Defendant Rukamp, as promoter, proposed the organization of a corporation to be known as the Associated Foundry & Machine Company. Plaintiffs subscribed for stock therein. Rukamp, in the name of the proposed corporation, purchased the equipment and plant of the Industrial Foundry & Brass Works, assumed the obligation of that company to the Commercial State & Savings Bank of Fenton, and gave a chattel mortgage in the name of the proposed corporation to defendant Olafsson, as trustee, to secure payment of the assumed obligation. The proposed corporation was never organized; articles of…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Duray Development, LLC v. PerrinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. PERRY & DERRICK CO. INC. v. KingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Bergy Bros. v. Zeeland Feeder Pig, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Kroll v. Crest Plastics, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. LeZontier v. ShockMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API