Legal Opinion

Paulk v. City of Ocilla

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 11, 1937No. 26008PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

This case arises on exceptions taken to the overruling of demurrers filed by a widow to the objections filed by the City of Ocilla to the return of appraisers setting apart to her a year’s support, and to the direction of a verdict by the judge of the superior court, to which the case was appealed by consent. The appraisers set apart to the widow a lot in the City of Ocilla which they valued at $1200. The city filed objections to this return, alleging, in substance, that the return was excessive; that the estate of the deceased, out of whose property the support was set apart, consisted of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Murphy v. VaughanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  3. Bearden v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Smith v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. City of BlackshearSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Canfield v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Paulk v. City of OcillaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Wade v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  5. Sanders v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API