Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 26, 1985No. 14411PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GAMMAGE, Justice.

The State of Texas and the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation [State] seek a writ of mandamus to compel the vacation of an order entered by the trial court. We will deny the requested relief.

This dispute arises out of a road construction contract between CPW Construction Company [CFW] and the State, under which CFW was to construct certain highway improvements for the State. The parties executed a standard form road construction contract, which provided a mandatory arbitration process for the resolution of all disputes arising under the contract. The State…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allen v. HumphreysTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. General Motors Corp. v. LawrenceTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State of Texas v. Martin Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Martinez v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Austin Bridge Company v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Transportation v. Jones Bros. Dirt & Paving Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Texas Department of Transportation v. Jones Bros. Dirt & Paving Contractors, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  3. Service Lloyds Insurance Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. National Surety Corp. v. Dominguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
  5. Estate of Gilbert v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API