Legal Opinion
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Bell
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided December 11, 1979No. 11082PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this appeal, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company and National Indemnity Company contend the district court erroneously determined that they were liable upon surety bonds issued as security in connection with a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. We agree and reverse.
The events leading to this appeal originated with a dispute between the respondents and Robert Morse over the rightful possession of a business known as the Hee Haw Nevada Club. *824Pending trial of the action to determine rightful possession, Morse obtained from the district court a temporary restraining…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- M. Blatt Company v. SouthwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF NEVADANevada Supreme Court · 1967
- St. Joseph & Elkhart Power Co. v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Sackett v. City of MorrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
- Cassem v. ErnstAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
4Cited by5 opinions
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Atkin, Wright & Miles, CharteredUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Tracy v. CapozziNevada Supreme Court · 1982
- Phoenix Aviation, Inc. v. MNK Enterprises, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1996
- Fuja v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Atkin, Wright & Miles, CharteredUtah Supreme Court · 1984