Legal Opinion

Lefevre v. Healy

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 2, 1942No. 3329PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The procedure is improper. The plaintiff’s only relief is by petition for abatement. Bean &c. Co. v. Jaffrey, 80 N. H. 343, 344. While the bill by amendment may be made a petition for abatement, it was not seasonably brought under the statute (P. L., c. 64, s. 14) in respect to the 1940 assessment, and for this reason alone that assessment can have no consideration.

Without attention to other questions bearing on the claimed exemption for 1941, the statute (P. L., c. 60, s. 26) reads in part: “Every soldier, . . . residing in this state who served for thirty days or more in the army of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bean & Symonds Co. v. JaffreySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Darnall v. DaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  2. Burger v. Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Coleman Bros. v. City of FranklinDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API