Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. Goord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 20, 2000PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of refusing a direct order and a urinalysis testing violation after he refused to produce a urine specimen. Petitioner commenced this proceeding contending, inter alia, that substantial evidence does not support the determination, that he did not willfully disobey the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kalwasinski v. SenkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Rizzuto v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Covington v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Chambers v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dawes v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Infante v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Pabon v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Shun Zhong v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Knickerbocker v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.