Legal Opinion

L. Woerner, Inc. v. Travelers Companies

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 7, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: The court properly compelled answers to those questions that were asked of defendants’ representative and objected to by defendants’ counsel at the examination before trial. The lawsuit involves defendants’ determination to reject plaintiffs claim as not payable under the insurance policy; it therefore necessarily involves an inquiry into the facts and criteria on which defendants relied in making that determination. The conduct and opinions of those who reviewed the claim are relevant to the action, and therefore the court properly directed…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lingener v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Wilson v. Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API