Legal Opinion
Harbor One Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 20, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, dated October 26, 1990, which, inter alia, denied the petitioner a rent increase on the ground that the installation of a backflow device did not qualify as a major capital improvement, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), entered November 18, 1992, which, inter alia, annulled the determination.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed on the law, with *690costs, the determination is confirmed, and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Ansonia Residents Ass'n v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- 126 Franklin Avenue Associates v. New York State Divsion of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Heissenbuttal v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Edward Stephen, Inc. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
3Cited by2 opinions
- Executive Towers at Lido v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Prospect Associates v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994