Legal Opinion

State Board of Education v. Carwile

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 13, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

In these two cases the plaintiffs seek by mandamus to compel the State Board of Education to strike certain names from its list of those eligible for appointment by local boards to the position of division superintendent of schools.

*667They differ in some unimportant particulars, but when a certain controverted matter of law is determined, both of them will have been decided on their merits.

Code 1936, section 649, in part provides as follows:

“No one shall be eligible for appointment as division superintendent unless he meets the minimum qualifications set up by the State Board of Education, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  2. Rinehart & Dennis Co. v. McArthurSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  3. Supervisors of Cumberland County v. RandolphSupreme Court of Virginia · 1893
  4. Virginia Coal & Iron Co. v. Keystone Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1903

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Richmond-Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  2. Banks v. SellersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  3. Griffin v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  4. State Ex Rel. Wiley v. State Road CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Banks v. SellersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API