Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
State v. Astra Zeneca AB
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 11, 2018No. 2016 CA 1073Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWelch, J.
I agree with the majority opinion insofar as it determines that the State of Louisiana has a right of action against AstraZeneca under LUTPA; that AstraZeneca's peremptory exception raising the objection of no right of action should have been overruled; that State v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc., 2015-1854, 2015-1626 (La. App. 1st Cir. 10/21/16), 208 So.3d 384, writs denied, 2017-0125, 2017-0149 (La. 3/13/17), 216 So.3d 802, 808, should be overruled to the extent that it recognized a partial objection of no right of action when the claims arise from the same set of operative facts; and that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Free v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- COASTAL ENVIRON. SPECIALISTS, INC. v. Chem-Lig International, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.