Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Figueroa

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 29, 1981No. 81-928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to abate for improper venue. We reverse.

The parties contracted for the sale of a boat owned by Goodwin. The Figueroas, as prospective purchasers, were required to deposit $4,000. When the Figueroas, alleging they were unable to obtain financing and thus complete the agreement, requested return of the deposit, Goodwin refused, claiming the deposit constituted liquidated damages. The Figueroas filed suit in Dade County Circuit Court claiming that financing was an agreed condition precedent to the contract and that Goodwin was being unjustly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Houston v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Mendez v. George Hunt, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. MacAsphalt Corp. v. Gen. Dev. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. USH Properties Corp. v. INTERCOASTAL INVEST. INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Earl Shomber & Co. v. Fla. Casino Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Sunshine Yacht Sales v. Anslow Yacht SalesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. D'Amato v. Feldman Printing Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Boatarama, Inc. v. LawsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API