Warren Staples v. State of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida
1DissentPariente, J.
In this case the defendant entered a best interest plea so that he was not required to admit the crime to which he pled guilty—traveling to meet a minor. More importantly, he was not required to admit—and did not actually admit in court— that he engaged in sexually deviant behavior. While I agree that the defendant need not be put on notice of every program-specific requirement of probation, I disagree with the majority’s attempt to characterize the substantial requirement, that is admitting to sexually deviant behavior, as merely “an internal, program-specific requirement” of probation.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- Lawson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- State v. MeeksSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Archer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Mills v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.