Lessee of Boyd v. Longworth
Ohio Supreme Court
This is an action of ejectment from Hamilton county. On the circuit there was a special verdict for the defendant, if on the questions of law made on the trial and reserved, he is, in the opinion of the court, entitled to it; but if not, then verdict to-be entered for plaintiff.
Read the full summary
This is an action of ejectment from Hamilton county. On the circuit there was a special verdict for the defendant, if on the questions of law made on the trial and reserved, he is, in the opinion of the court, entitled to it; but if not, then verdict to-be entered for plaintiff. On September 10, 1816, an execution-issued from the Hamilton common pleas, on a judgment rendered at the March term thereof, in the same year, in favor of Isaac-Morgan and another, against William R. Goodwin and another, and was levied on the land in question, as the property of the said Goodwin. Under a vendí, issued…
1Opinion of the CourtBirchard, J.
Several questions are presented, which render this case intricate, and the decision somewhat difficult, if they are allowed to be so mixed up as to prevent each one from receiving a separate consideration. In examining them severally, we have *216found little difficulty in arriving at conclusions satisfactory to our own minds, aided, as we have been, by the careful, orderly, and thorough preparation of the case by counsel.
*The plaintiff’s first claim of title is under the deed from the heirs of Goodwin. These heirs took, by descent, from Goodwin whatever interest they had to convey. Their estate…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Scott v. WingenbergOhio Court of Appeals · 1916