Legal Opinion

Warfield v. Shan Associates of Syosset, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 12, 2010PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs (see Wilson v Rojas, 63 AD3d 1048 [2009]), the defendants Shan Associates of Syosset, LLC (hereinafter Shan), and Rosemary Glover failed to demonstrate a prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of whether or not they had constructive or actual notice of the alleged slippery condition (see Taylor v Rochdale Vil., Inc., 60 AD3d 930 [2009]). Additionally, there are issues of fact as to whether the lighting in the parking lot where the accident occurred was inadequate and, if so, whether it was a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gestetner v. TeitelbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Wilson v. RojasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Taylor v. Rochdale Village, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Proulx v. Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Healy v. BartolomeiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Barretta v. Glen Cove Property, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Proulx v. Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API