Collard v. Keeton
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The defendants to the counterclaim have appealed a final judgment based on a jury verdict in a personal injury action arising out of an automobile intersectional collision. They have .presented ten points for reversal. We consider that only two of these points require discussion at this time. As to the remaining points, it is sufficient to state that we have examined the record in light of them and in light of the arguments pertaining thereto and have concluded that reversible error has not been shown.
Appellants’ first point claims error upon an alleged refusal of the court to instruct the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Florida East Coast Railway Company v. MorganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Hammack v. VeilletteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
3Cited by3 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Dev. v. Napoleon SteelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Preferred Risk Mut. Ins. Co. v. SabodaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Pasqua v. BurnsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980