Legal Opinion

Honeycutt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 3, 1964No. A-13414Published

1Opinion of the Court

BUSSEY, Judge:

On the 6th day of August, 1963, there was filed in this Court, a petition in error, for and on behalf of Opal Honeycutt, with neither casemade nor transcript attached. Thereafter, and on the 7th day of November, 1963, a Motion to Dismiss was duly filed by the County Attorney of McIntosh County, Oklahoma, for and on behalf of the State of Oklahoma.

Thereafter, this matter was set for Oral Argument on the 1st day of April, 1964, and was submitted on the argument and briefs of the parties.

On the record before us, we are of the opinion that the Motion to Dismiss should be and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Love v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Richter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API