Legal Opinion

Perry v. United States

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided January 23, 1974No. Civ. 4157, 4158PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

DUPREE, District Judge.

In these two tax refund suits which have been consolidated and submitted to the court on cross motions for summary judgment based on an agreed statement of facts, the plaintiffs, Carey J. Perry and J. Doyle Medders, two physicians who practice as a partnership, seek to recover the amounts assessed and collected from them (by Perry, $1,088.92, and by Medders, $925.56) resulting from a determination by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue that the taxpayers were not entitled to deductions on their 1969 income tax returns of $4,800.00 paid by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Skemp v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  2. Brown v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. I. L. Van Zandt and Ruth B. Van Zandt v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  4. Mathews v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  5. Oakes v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carey J. Perry and Marietta M. Perry v. United States of America, J. Doyle Medders and Constance D. Medders v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  2. Henderson v. Aria Resort and Casino Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
  3. May v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  4. May v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API