Hoaglin v. Carr's Administratrix
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
CULLEN, Commissioner.
• Ted Carr recovered judgment against E. M. Hoaglin . for, .$4,383.45, representing an allowance to Carr of a major portion of his cla-inj .for one-half of -the .profits of .a venture in which the parties hád engaged, to nourish and develop thoroughbred wean-lings for sale at the .yearling markets. Hoaglin has appealed, and Carr, has cross-appealed. .. Hoaglin’s main contention is ' that the nature- of the'action was such'-that, he,.was .entitled aS a matter of right to a jury trial, and that the. court erred in overruling his motion for a jury.trial, and in hearing and…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1995
- Brandenburg v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
- McGuire v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
- City of Shively v. HydeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969