Legal Opinion
Roebuck v. USAble Life
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided March 30, 2019No. Case No. 4:18-cv-00092 KGBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge
This is an action filed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. ("ERISA"), by plaintiff Karen Roebuck (Dkt. No. 1). Defendant USAble Life ("USAble") filed an answer to Ms. Roebuck's complaint (Dkt. No. 6), and the parties submitted an administrative record (Dkt. No. 12). Ms. Roebuck then filed a motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 15). USAble responded, and Ms. Roebuck replied (Dkt. Nos. 18, 19).
Although Ms. Roebuck's motion is styled as one for summary judgment, she does not cite Federal Rule of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Beverly D. Woo v. Deluxe Corp., Hartford Life Insurance Co., Doing Business as Itt Hartford, Inc., Sued as Hartford Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Carl L. Farley v. Benefit Trust Life Insurance Company, Carl L. Farley v. Benefit Trust Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hestir v. USAble LifeDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2020
- Orr v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2022