Legal Opinion

In re Johns

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 24, 2013No. 104,570Published

1Opinion of the Court

On December 23, 2010, this court suspended the respondent, Jeffrey M. Johns, from the practice of law in Kansas for a period of 2 years. See In re Johns, 291 Kan. 638, 243 P.3d 1101 (2010). Before reinstatement, the respondent was required to pay the costs of the disciplinary action, present a professional evaluation, and comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2012 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 397), as amended December 1, 2012, and comply with Supreme Court Rule 219 (2012 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 398), as amended December 1, 2012.

On January 25, 2013, the respondent filed a petition with this court for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re JohnsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API