Legal Opinion

Andrew Jackson v. Byran Bartow

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 23, 2019No. 19-1168PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

A Wisconsin trial court denied Andrew L. Jackson's request to represent himself at trial, and Jackson later pleaded guilty. He seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2554 , arguing that Wisconsin unreasonably applied Supreme Court precedent involving the Sixth Amendment right for competent defendants to represent themselves at trial. The district court agreed with Jackson that the Wisconsin trial court erred in ruling that he could not represent himself at trial, but it nonetheless denied his petition. It correctly concluded that under Gomez v. Berge , 434 F.3d 940 (7th Cir. 2006),…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Thomas Hurlow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. James Gomez v. Gerald A. Berge, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Andre DewberryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  2. Moody v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2023
  3. State v. TriceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  4. Cristian M. Loga-Negru v. Robert MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026
  5. Hayden Nix v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API