Commonwealth v. Fox

The defendant appeals from the order revoking his probation and imposing sentence, which was based on his failure to abide by the condition of his probation that prohibited him from contacting Devone Fox (his former wife) directly or indirectly. We affirm.

The defendant argues that there was insufficient evidence to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he violated the condition of his probation2 that required him to have "[n]o contact, direct or indirect in any form, and stay away from Devon[e] Fox." In essence, he contends that because the letters were addressed generally to the "Fox…