Legal Opinion

Robert Marye & Co. v. Root

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval county. The facts of the case are stated in the.opinion of the court. •

1Opinion of the Court

Ranky, O. J.:

The allegations of the bill are :

1. That appellants recovered judgment at law against, Root, February 5th, 3888, and that, execution issued thereon and has been returned nulla bona.

2. That on July 18th, 3809, a described piece of real 'estate in Jacksonville was conveyed by Holmes and wife to Mrs. Root, “to have and to hold the said premises with the appurtenances unto the party of the second part, her heirs and assigns, to her and their own' sole and proper use, benefit and behoof in fee simple;'5 and on the 38th of March, 1875, Reed and *455wife conveyed another piece of land in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barber v. RootMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  2. State ex rel. McQuaid v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  3. Dollner, Potter & Co. v. SnowSupreme Court of Florida · 1877
  4. McGill v. McGillSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
  5. Fairchild v. House ex rel. KnightSupreme Court of Florida · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ohio Butterine Co. v. HargraveSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Blood v. HuntSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  3. Florida Citrus Exchange v. GrishamSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  4. Graham v. TuckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  5. Rawls v. Tallahassee Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API