People v. Wilson

Defendant abandoned his claim that identification evidence by one of the eyewitnesses should have been precluded when he conceded that he received oral notice of a photo identification at his Criminal Court arraignment (People v Gillard, 215 AD2d 216, 217, lv denied 86 NY2d 794), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. If we were to review the claim, we would find that defendant waived it by moving to *498suppress the identification (see, People v Brown, 224 AD2d 226), and also that the notice given at the Criminal Court arraignment was sufficiently specific.

Since there was a…