Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,139 W. Emmerson Daily v. Grady E. Morgan
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:
We address in this interlocutory appeal the merits of the “sale of business” doctrine, which holds that the transfer of a 100 percent stock interest or a controlling stock interest in a business is not covered by the federal securities laws. At this writing, at least three circuits have followed the doctrine, 1 while at least two others have rejected it. 2 Recognizing the merit on both sides of the question, we hold that the sale of ordinary corporate stock in a business to a buyer who plans to manage and control it is covered by section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Landreth Timber Co. v. LandrethSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,667 Reprosystem, B v. and N. Norman Muller, and Cross-Appellants v. Scm Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,024 Futura Development Corporation v. Centex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Yoder v. Orthomolecular Nutrition Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Mays v. RidenhourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.