Legal Opinion

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,139 W. Emmerson Daily v. Grady E. Morgan

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 28, 1983No. 82-4077PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

We address in this interlocutory appeal the merits of the “sale of business” doctrine, which holds that the transfer of a 100 percent stock interest or a controlling stock interest in a business is not covered by the federal securities laws. At this writing, at least three circuits have followed the doctrine, 1 while at least two others have rejected it. 2 Recognizing the merit on both sides of the question, we hold that the sale of ordinary corporate stock in a business to a buyer who plans to manage and control it is covered by section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Landreth Timber Co. v. LandrethSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,667 Reprosystem, B v. and N. Norman Muller, and Cross-Appellants v. Scm Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,024 Futura Development Corporation v. Centex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  4. Yoder v. Orthomolecular Nutrition Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. State Ex Rel. Mays v. RidenhourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API