Fish v. Hahn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Henrietta Hahn, from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York oh: the 6th day of June, 1907, affirming a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of said court on the 17-th day of January, 1907, upon tile verdict of a jury, with notice of an intention to bring up for review upon such appeal the said judgment…
Read the full summary
Appeal by the defendant, Henrietta Hahn, from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York oh: the 6th day of June, 1907, affirming a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of said court on the 17-th day of January, 1907, upon tile verdict of a jury, with notice of an intention to bring up for review upon such appeal the said judgment of the City Court, and an order of said City Court denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon- the…
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, J.: -
This action, was brought to recover damages for the. breach of' a contract. The complaint alleges, in. substance, that the plaintiff was employed by the defendant to purchase, a plot of land, secure a loan.of $5,000 thereon, and thereafter to superintend the erection of a building upon such lot; that for the services to be thus rendered the defendant agreed to pay him ten per cent of the actual cost of the building; that the plaintiff fully performed the contract on his part, except in so far as prevented by defendant; that the estimated value of t-lie cost of the building…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Fish v. HahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909