Legal Opinion

Graham v. England

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gkeen

This proceeding- was instituted by the comptroller of the state to obtain a declaration as to his duties under certain constitutional and statutory provisions. The principal question presented is the validity of chapter 73 of the Acts of 1870-71. The rights of the defendant England herein are based upon that statute, and a bona-fide controversy has arisen between the said England and the comptroller. The chancellor was of opinion, and so declared, that tlie aforesaid statute was unconstitutional, and defendant England has appealed.

In the August election of 1918, N. R. Barham was elected judge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MannSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883
  2. State ex rel. Bickford v. CockeTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Conger v. RoyTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State ex rel. Gann v. MaloneTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Groveland Banking Co. v. City Nat. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Roane CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Barham v. GrahamTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Kimsey v. HyattTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State ex rel. Turner v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  5. State Ex Rel. Byrd v. Scott CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API