Legal Opinion

The Merrimac

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1872PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana, in a ease of collision condemning the Merrimac for damages done to the Gladiator.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clifford

stated the facts, and delivered the opinion of the court.

Vessels engaged in commerce are liable for damage occasioned by collision by reason of the negligence, want of care, or skill on the part of those intrusted with their navigation, or on account of the complicity, direct or indirect, of their owners. Owners appoint the master and employ the crew, and consequently the owners are held responsible for the’ conduct of the master and crew in the management of the vessel. ’

Damages were claimed in the libel in this ease, which was filed in the District Court by the owners of the steamtdg…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. The John G. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Homer Ramsdell Transportation Co. v. La Compagnie Générale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Societa Per Azioni De Navigazione Italia v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Ernest E. Burgess v. M/v Tamano, Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  5. Ins. Co. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API