Weston v. Falk
Nebraska Supreme Court
ERROR from the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Hoiimes, J. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, J.
This is a proceeding in error brought by Charles Wes' ton, auditor of public accounts, and George W. Marsh, secretary of state, on behalf of the state, from an order made by the district court for Lancaster county requiring the auditor and secretary of state to allow and approve a claim and draw a warrant in favor of defendant in error, Falk, for the sum of $2,916.83. The defendant in error presented to the auditor a claim against the state for the sum of $8,750.50 for supplies alleged to have been furnished the state for the use of the inmates of the asylum for the insane located at…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ind. Dist. v. Dist. Tp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Mississippi & Missouri Railroad v. ByingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
- Borgalthous v. Farmers & Merchants' Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Murphy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
3Cited by7 opinions
- Meade Plumbing, Heating & Lighting Co. v. IrwinNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- First Trust Co. v. HammondNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
- Thurston v. Travelers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- McKee v. GoodrichNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- State Ex Rel. Heintze v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.