Legal Opinion

BIEBINGER v. Minnesota

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 20, 2001No. CIV 00-1948ADM/AJBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MONTGOMERY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the undersigned United States District Judge pursuant to Petitioner Larry Curtis Biebinger’s Objection [Doc. No. 11] to the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan. The R & R, dated January 19, 2001 [Doc. No. 10], recommends that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [Doc. No. 1] be dismissed with prejudice. For the reasons set forth below, the R & R is adopted in its entirety.

II. BACKGROUND

The factual background for this matter is set forth in the R &…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Leslie D. Willis v. Dr. P. J. CicconeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  3. Larry Gene Bell v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General, State of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. James Fremont Farmer, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Albers v. RalstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API