Legal Opinion

Arbuckle v. Ciccotelli

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 30, 2004No. 03-239PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAmestoy, C.J.

¶ 1. Appellant Ernest Ciccotelli appeals pro se from the family court’s denial of his motion for an emergency modification of spousal support, and his motion for a permanent modification of spousal support, pursuant to 15 V.S.A. § 758. Appellant claims that the court erred in holding that the family court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to modify an award of rehabilitative maintenance when the motion to modify is filed after the expiration of the original term. We affirm.

*105¶ 2. Ernest Ciccotelli and Brenda Arbuckle were divorced by decree of the Windsor Family Court on January 26, 1999. The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Doerflinger v. DoerflingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Hackley v. HackleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Cates v. CatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. Cleverly v. CleverlySupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  5. Tudhope v. RiehleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Iannarone v. LimoggioSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. Felis v. FelisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  3. Meghan Forrett v. Orion StoneSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  4. Gronland v. GronlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Joseph v. JosephSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API