Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Weimer
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 1894No. 5586PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error from the district court of Custer county. Tried below before Harrison, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Ragan, C.
On, and some time prior to, the 13th day of November, 1891, Charles Homan and Carl Arnold (hereinafter called' “the bank”) were associated together as partners under the name of Kloman & Arnold, and conducting a general banking business in the city of Broken Bow, Custer county, Nebraska. David Weimer was a depositor in said bank, and on said date it was indebted to him in the sum of' $2,414.56. On said date he brought a suit in the district court of Custer county against- said bank, caused an attachment to be issued and levied upon certain real estate belonging to said bank.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Walling v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Von Roun v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- State v. Commercial State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Hubbard v. President, Directors of Hamilton BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1844
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lawson v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Andrews v. Steele City BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Dodson v. WightmanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897
- Brownell v. SvobodaNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
- Arnold v. Globe Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.