Legal Opinion

State v. Anaya-Espino

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 2013No. 48,025-KWPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

| defendant, Jorge Luis Anaya-Espino, was charged by bill of information with operating a vehicle without lawful presence in the United States, a violation of La. R.S. 14:100.13. He filed a motion to quash the bill of information on grounds that federal immigration law preempts La. R.S. 14:100.13; that the statute is unconstitutionally vague, overbroad, and violates due process by shifting the burden of persuasion of an essential element of the offense to the defendant, namely, by requiring him to prove that he is lawfully in the United States.

The trial court denied the motion to quash after…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Ferry v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State of Louisiana v. Keren MejiaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. State of Louisiana v. Pineda Yanez OsbaldoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. State of Louisiana v. Yolanda MartinezLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. State v. MartinezLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. State v. MejiaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API